Is turning out to vote a public good contribution? Evidence from a new democracy
نویسندگان
چکیده
Why do people turn out to vote? By requiring coordination and by generating positive externalities on others while involving a private cost, turning out to vote resembles a public good contribution and is therefore subject to collective action problems. While this has been established theoretically, the empirical evidence is fraught with measurement and identification problems. We investigate whether the motivations for turning out to vote are similar to those for contributing to a public good by comparing voter turnout with contributions to a public good in a very simple, clearly defined laboratory experiment. We conduct our study in a new democracy, Albania. We investigate voter turnout in two different contexts: the elections of parent class representatives in primary schools, and the 2009 parliamentary elections. We combine survey and experimental data on 1800 randomly selected parents from 180 nationally representative primary schools, with data generated by the 2008 LSMS survey, and with official district-level records on voter turn-out in the 2009 elections. Our findings suggest that turning out to vote is indeed a public good contribution: individuals’ propensities to contribute to the public good in the experiment predict both their participation in the school-level elections of parent class representatives, and the district-level voter turnout in the national elections. JEL CODES: C93, D72, H4, O12
منابع مشابه
Online Community and Democracy
The debate over the contribution of the Internet to democracy is farfrom settled. Some point to the empowering effects of online discussionand fund raising on recent electoral campaigns in the US to argue thatthe Internet will restore the public sphere. Others claim that the Internetis just a virtual mall, a final extension of global capitalism into everycorner of our lives. This paper argues f...
متن کاملProviding Value to New Health Technology: The Early Contribution of Entrepreneurs, Investors, and Regulatory Agencies
Background New technologies constitute an important cost-driver in healthcare, but the dynamics that lead to their emergence remains poorly understood from a health policy standpoint. The goal of this paper is to clarify how entrepreneurs, investors, and regulatory agencies influence the value of emerging health technologies. Methods Our 5-year qualitative research program examined the proces...
متن کاملThe discourse theory of democracy and public sphere in Habermas's ideas
Research and scientific explanation about discourse democracy theory of Jurgen Habermas and studying and evaluating reflection and generalization of his philosophical and epistemological principles are objectives which the researcher follows in this research From this view, there is studied representation of concepts and categories such as cognitive interests, communication action, discoursing...
متن کاملShaping Policy Change in Population Health: Policy Entrepreneurs, Ideas, and Institutions
Political realities and institutional structures are often ignored when gathering evidence to influence population health policies. If these policies are to be successful, social science literature on policy change should be integrated into the population health approach. In this contribution, drawing on the work of John W. Kingdon and related scholarship, we set out to examine how key componen...
متن کاملCapitalism, Democracy and Ralph's Pretty Good Grocery
alph's Pretty Good Grocery, for those like me who miss popular culture allusions, is a fictional shop in the imaginary Minnesota town of Lake Wobegon, a place invented by the humorist Garrison Keilor. Its slogan is 'If you can't get it at Ralph's, you can probably get along without it'. For political scientist John Mueller, this slogan sums up capitalism and democracy. They may not supply every...
متن کامل